Sunday, December 7, 2014

Advancing the dissection of the Internet’s Affect on Us

One of the greatest controversies for those who live in today’s society is that of the Internet’s affect on us. We are pretty evenly divided on our beliefs based on how it has affected us individually and how we see it as a benefit or a curse to our productivity and development. Among those who have made their voices heard on the matter are Nicholas Carr and Clive Thompson. Carr makes clear in his work that he is noticing a difference in the way he thinks because of his extensive use of the Internet. “The Internet is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind” (Course Reader 59). He mostly portrays that he believes the Internet is taking us over and that is negatively impacting the growth and development of humans. Thompson on the other hand applauds the Internet for pushing people to writing in larger amounts, not to mention the quality of writing had also taken a turn for the best as described in his work. His purpose for writing this essay is to demonstrate to the public a number of ways that writing online is actually increasing our literacy. Although typically seen as opposites, I find myself agreeing with points expressed in both Thompson and Carr’s articles.
In this essay, I will be analyzing both Carr and Thompson’s work and how persuasive they are in their arguments. I will be examining the points made based on how they relate to my life experiences and observations. Then I will introduce my view on the topic and how it extends and qualifies Thompson while qualifying and complicating Carr simultaneously. However, I will still look at both articles as one entity since both Carr and Thompson’s points essentially go hand in hand, for their individual points are nothing but puzzle pieces that fit together to form the bigger picture of just how dominant the Internet has been on our contemporary lives.
Thompson’s main topic of conversation is “The increase in writing we see with digital technologies is good because writing can clarify our thinking, generate ideas and improve memory” (course reader 51). Through his claim, he is emphasizing the fact that the Internet is actually a powerhouse for ideas. We are able to expand our knowledge based on what other people have made public on the web and this helps us to become more intellectual people and more worldly due to the fact that we are working more together as a society. The fact that the idea of online prose is such an abundant way of writing to one’s potential as to use it in an academic study goes to show that this discovery is far from myth. Thompson uses a historical occurrence to support the idea that the way we think is a product of our environment. “If four astronomers discovered sunspots at the same time, it’s partly because of the quality of lenses in telescopes in 1611 had matured to the point where it was finally possible to pick out small details on the sun and partly because the question of the sun’s role in the universe had become newly interesting in the wake of Copernicus’s heliocentric theory” (Thompson 59). This directly ties into present-day Americans and the development of the Internet as a place where we can freely express ourselves through our individual and original writing. If the people who surround us are writing more due to the accessibility and convenience of the Internet, we will follow the crowd due to our human nature of being “pack animals”.
The main concern Carr establishes in his writing is that the Internet is actually manipulating the way we think because of the information we are willing to put in our heads. “For me, as for others, the Net is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind” (Course Reader 59). He views the Internet as more of an evil entity that is trying to take away our human dignity and suck us in to the revolution the Internet is hyped up to be.
When I think about my personal experiences with the Internet and am able to extend and qualify Thompson with it. I have embraced the constant changes and it has brought me nothing but convenience.  I often find myself lost in Facebook at times spending hours on end reading and analyzing how people present themselves on social media which has made me appreciate reading and writing more. Facebook is a form of reading and writing in which I enjoy and I am able to find myself “escaping from time” in my quest to read more statuses. The Internet has been an increased benefit to me as a student and a more analytical person all around. I am now constantly surrounded by reading and writing unlike before when my teachers forced me to read books for class I wasn’t able to understand and would take me forever to get through. Now that I am reading and writing more than ever because of the convenience of the Internet, I am able to get through a book faster and understand complex texts easier.
            On the other hand, my personal anecdote both qualifies and complicates Carr’s ideas in his text. He mentions, “The web has been a godsend to [him] as a writer” (Course Reader 58). This is qualified by my anecdote in that I do spend more time reading other people’s work on the Internet including articles and blogs. I know my friends feel the same way, especially when I refer them to articles that I particularly enjoyed. Not only does it help my friends receive insight on certain topics, but it also further gets the name of the author out there which encourages them to keep publishing their ideas. However, my experience with the Internet complicates the overall message in Carr’s work. “…what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation” (Course Reader 59).  The connotation Carr gives the reader through his work communicates that he doesn’t like the way the Internet is changing us because we are becoming less intellectual in the way we think and analyze information. For me as an individual, I have noticed my concentration heighten due to the Internet because now I am used to reading for extensive amounts of time. 
The main concern Carr establishes in his writing is that the Internet is actually manipulating the way we think because of what we are willing to put in our heads. However, Carr mentions nothing about the effects the Internet has on our ability to write which is the majority of all Thompson talks about. For this reason, if Carr were to talk more along the lines of writing and Thompson were to talk more about reading, I’m sure their opinions and ideas would cross paths.








References
1.              Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” RWS Course Reader. Ed. Department of Rhetoric and Writing Studies. San Diego: Montezuma Publishing, 2014. 58-64. Print.
2.              Thompson, Clive.








Friday, December 5, 2014

beginnings to the final essay. homework for 12/5

Advancing the dissection of the Internet’s Affect on Us
One of the greatest controversies for those who live in today’s society is that of the Internet’s affect on us. We are pretty evenly divided on our beliefs based on how it has affected us individually and how we see it as a benefit or a curse to our productivity and development. Among those who have made their voices heard on the matter are Nicholas Carr and Clive Thompson. Carr makes clear in his work that he is noticing a difference in the way he thinks because of his extensive use of the Internet. “The Internet is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind” (Course Reader 59). Thompson on the other hand applauds the Internet for pushing people to writing in larger amounts, not to mention the quality of writing had also taken a turn for the best as described in his work. His purpose for writing this essay is to demonstrate to the public a number of ways that writing online is actually increasing our literacy. Although typically seen as opposites, I find myself agreeing with points expressed in both Thompson and Carr’s articles.




Wednesday, December 3, 2014

extended outline

Claim from Thompson in which I am responding:
“We know that reading changes the way we think. Among other things, it helps us formulate thoughts that are more abstract, categorical, and logical.” (Pub. Thinking 51)

Sub-claim concerning sub-topic:
Clarifying thinking: we can search for information on the Internet by categories so we are more mentally organized which opens more doors for us in our cognitive abilities which begins with retaining more information.
I think the Internet has ultimately aided in our overall cognitive strength because the average person is reading at least double of what they were reading prior to its existence.

Personal account
Qualifies
 I am able to concentrate on one subject at a time on the computer but the Internet also helps me stem off from it getting outside information and broadening my knowledge on the topic without fixating on one single part.
            It has taught us to pick out important information rather than wasting time on extra information (Carr challenges this statement because he thinks we should be reading more precise when we read)

Ebooks source
Complicates/extends
I am not able to study well on a computer because I cannot physically highlight or turn the pages.
            Ebooks and the Internet is good for getting fast information but not for actual studying and analytical reading.


MLA citation:
1) "Students Reading E-Books Are Losing Out, Study Suggests." Motherlode Students Reading EBooks Are Losing Out Study Suggests Comments. N.p., 10 Apr. 2014. Web. 23 Nov. 2014.

2) Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” RWS Course Reader. Ed. Department of Rhetoric and Writing Studies. San Diego: Montezuma Publishing, 2014. 58-64. Print.

 3) Thompson, Clive. “Public Thinking”. RWS Course Reader. Ed. Department of Rhetoric and Writing Studies. San Diego: Montezuma Publishing. 2014.42-52. Print.


Sunday, November 23, 2014

homework 11/24

Claim from Thompson in which I am responding:
“We know that reading changes the way we think. Among other things, it helps us formulate thoughts that are more abstract, categorical, and logical.” (Pub. Thinking 51)

Sub-claim concerning sub-topic:
Clarifying thinking: we can search for information on the Internet by categories so we are more mentally organized which opens more doors for us in our cognitive abilities which begins with retaining more information.
I think the Internet has ultimately aided in our overall cognitive strength because the average person is reading at least double of what they were reading prior to its existence.

MLA citation:
1) "Students Reading E-Books Are Losing Out, Study Suggests." Motherlode Students Reading EBooks Are Losing Out Study Suggests Comments. N.p., 10 Apr. 2014. Web. 23 Nov. 2014.

2) Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” RWS Course Reader. Ed. Department of Rhetoric and Writing Studies. San Diego: Montezuma Publishing, 2014. 58-64. Print.

 3) Thompson, Clive. “Public Thinking”. RWS Course Reader. Ed. Department of Rhetoric and Writing Studies. San Diego: Montezuma Publishing. 2014.42-52. Print.

Explanation of souces:
Ebooks source: complicates/extends

Carr: challenges

Friday, November 21, 2014

anecdote homework 11/21

I can’t help but applaud Thompson for his accurate and open-minded research brought together in his writing. When I think about my personal experiences with the Internet and am able to extend Thompson with it, it makes sense that Thompson is ten years younger than Carr. Thompson is naturally more open to the change that the Internet has brought the world being that he has ten years less than Carr of being exposed to the original way of doing things. Some people are just naturally scared of change because it pushes them out of their comfort zone. However, I have embraced the constant changes and it has brought me nothing but convenience.  I often find myself lost in Facebook at times spending hours on end reading and analyzing how people present themselves on social media which has made me appreciate reading and writing more. Facebook is a form of reading and writing in which I enjoy and I am able to find myself “escaping from time” in my quest to read more statuses. The Internet has been an increased benefit to me as a student and a more analytical person all around. I am now constantly surrounded by reading and writing unlike before when my teachers were forcing me to read books for class I wasn’t able to understand and would take me forever to get through. Now that I am reading and writing more than ever because of the convenience of the Internet, I am able to get through a book faster and understand complex texts easier.

            On the other hand, my personal anecdote both qualifies and complicates Carr’s ideas in his text. He mentions, “The web has been a godsend to [him] as a writer” (Course Reader 58). This is qualified by my anecdote in that I do spend more time reading other people’s work on the Internet including articles and blogs. I know my friends feel the same way, especially when I refer them to articles that I particularly enjoyed. Not only does it help my friend receive insight on certain topics, but it also further gets the name of the author out there which encourages them to keep publishing their ideas. However, my experience with the Internet complicates the overall message in Carr’s work. “…what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation” (Course Reader 59).  The connotation Carr gives the reader through his work communicates that he doesn’t like the way the Internet is changing us because we are becoming less intellectual in the way we think and analyze information. For me as an individual, I have noticed my concentration heighten due to the Internet because now I am used to reading for extensive amounts of time.